Legal Opinion

Estate of Philpott v. Philpott

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 17, 1915PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. Hugh Brennan, Judge. Action upon two promissory notes. The action is in the form of a claim filed against the estate of decedent, the notes being the basis of the claim. The plaintiff was not the payee of the notes but claims as a holder in due course. A defense was pleaded, good as against the payee.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. Hugh Brennan, Judge. Action upon two promissory notes. The action is in the form of a claim filed against the estate of decedent, the notes being the basis of the claim. The plaintiff was not the payee of the notes but claims as a holder in due course. A defense was pleaded, good as against the payee. The trial court directed a verdict for the plaintiff on the ground that he was a holder in due course without notice of infirmity in either note. The defendant executrix appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

— The defendant is the executrix of the etsate of her husband, C. H. Philpott. On June 12, 1911, Philpott entered into a contract with the American-Canadian Land Company, a co-partnership, for the purchase of certain Texas lands, and executed his notes therefor to a total of about $7,000. October 25, 1911, this contract was cancelled by a written agreement and the land company agreed to return to Philpott his notes. The return was never made. Philpott died a year later. The claim herein is based upon two of said notes, one for $1,500 and the other for $1,000. The' defense here indicated being…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Field v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  4. National Bank of North America v. KirbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Ayer v. HutchinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Household Finance Company, Inc. v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. McLean v. PaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. City National Bank of Auburn v. MasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. First National Bank of Fairbanks v. TaylorAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Lutton v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API