Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Tomlin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 23, 1958No. 3 Div. 767PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

The appellees, A. H. Tomlin and wife Ruth Tomlin, filed a bill in equity against the appellants, Bill Rhodes and wife Margie Rhodes and Herman Roberson, to rescind a contract for the sale of realty and to recover the earnest money and installment payments made on the purchase price. The trial court, after hearing the evidence ore tenus and after allowing the appellants two extended periods in which to clear the title, decreed that the contract should be rescinded and that the complainants should recover of the respondents the money paid under the contract. The decree…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Davis & Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Eufaula Grocery Co. v. Missouri National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Street v. Alexander City BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. White v. State Ex Rel. FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Herby Berryhill and Lucille Berryhill v. Rich Plan of Pensacola, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Mader v. JamesWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Cash v. UsreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. Martin v. First National Bank of OpelikaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Gilmore v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API