Paepcke v. Paine
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
Plaintiff brought replevin to recover from defendants, a firm of brokers, certain corporate debentures, hereafter spoken of as bonds, which had been stolen from her, but which had been acquired by defendants in good faith, for value and without notice. Trial was had before the court without a jury. An agreed statement of facts was filed. It is conceded that, if the bonds are negotiable instruments, defendants have title thereto. The court found as a matter of law that they were not, and entered a judgment for the plaintiff, of which defendants seek review by writ of error.
It seems to be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Enoch v. BrandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hibbs v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Continental Guaranty Corp. v. Peoples Bus LineSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
- Crosthwaite v. Moline Plow Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1924
- Brainerd v. . New York and Harlem Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Cont'nal Natl. Bk. of Ft. Worth v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Sturgis National Bank v. Harris Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Merchants National Bank v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Marine National Exchange Bank v. Kalt-Zimmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.