Legal Opinion

McLean v. Paddock

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1967No. 8032PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOBLE, Justice.

The circumstances giving rise to this appeal began in 1958 when Carl R. Paddock and Essie Paddock, his wife (hereafter referred to as Paddocks), executed a real estate listing authorizing Harper Realty Company, a real estate broker (hereafter referred to as Harper), to sell their motel. Harper produced a purchaser acceptable to Paddocks, and a binder agreement was executed, reciting a deposit of $1,000 and providing for a further cash down payment of $8,000 on a total price of $249,000. Both-the listing and the binder agreement called for the payment to Plarper of a 6%…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Downs v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. Munroe v. HarrimanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. Papke v. G. H. Hammond Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Furst v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Duke City Lumber Company, Inc. v. TerrelNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Terrel v. Duke City Lumber Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Matter of ValdezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Sierra Blanca Sales Co., Inc. v. Newco Industries, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Hockett v. WinksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API