Legal Opinion

Siegman v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 31, 1916No. 1620; No. 1621PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Cross appeals from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7770 (T. D. 35676).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Narrow woven fabrics of various kinds, composed in chief value of tinsel wire or of metal threads and imported at the port of New York were classified by the collector of customs as laces, trimmings, and galloons, composed wholly or in chief value of metal threads, yarns, or filaments. In accordance with this classification, they were assessed for duty at 60 per cent ad valorem under that part of paragraph 368 of the tariff act of 1913 which reads as follows:

358. Laces, ⅜ * * and all lace articles of whatever yams, threads, or filaments composed; * * ⅜ galloons, * ⅜ ⅜ ornaments; braids, loom…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Horstman Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Veit, Son & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API