Horstman Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 38035.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
This appeal concerns the dutiable classification of certain military epaulets. They were reported by the appraiser and returned by the collector at the port of Philadelphia as composed in chief value of metal threads. The Board of General Appraisers so found. Counsel for the importers, who are appellants in this court, open their brief with the statement: “ There is no dispute in this case about the facts. The merchandise consisted of epaulets — military ornaments — composed in chief value of metal threads * * The court, therefore, must assume this as a fact in the case and so does.
*459The issue…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- G. Hirsch's Sons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
- Wolff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
- Rosenberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1905
- Tyler Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Veit, Son & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Siegman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916