State v. Young
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
The sole question presented for our review is whether the trial court erred in submitting the crime of larceny from the person as a lesser included offense of common law robbery, the crime charged against defendant in the bill of indictment. A majority of the Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not err in this respect, and we agree with that conclusion.
Our courts have consistently considered robbery to be merely an aggravated larceny and thus have held that a defendant may be properly convicted of larceny from the person upon an indictment for common law robbery.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Lee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. Huyen Bich NguyenWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. PickardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. WorthamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.