Legal Opinion

State v. Riera

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 11, 1970No. 6PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s failure to allow his motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

The portions of the statute relevant to decision in this case are as follows:

-“§ 90-113.2. Prohibited acts. — It shall be unlawful:

“(3) For any person to possess a barbiturate or stimulant drug unless such person obtained such barbiturate or stimulant drug in good faith on the prescription of a practitioner in accordance with subdivision (l)a or in accordance with subdivision (l)c of this section or in good faith from a person licensed ■by the laws of any other state or the District of Columbia…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. State v. AlbartySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API