Legal Opinion

State v. . Bell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 24, 1948PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEevxN, J.

The defendants stress their contention that the trial court ought to have dismissed both charges for insufficiency of proof in conformity to their motions for judgment of nonsuit under the statute. G. S., 15-173. It is obvious that this position is well taken with respect to the indictment wherein the defendants are alleged to have robbed Stewart Fox! The consequence is that consideration will be given in detail here only to the assignments of error relating to the case in which the defendants have been convicted of the perpetration of robbery with firearms upon Ernest Fox.

In so far as it is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Montsdoca v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  2. State v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. State v. . ManningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. State v. . BurkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API