Legal Opinion

State v. Wortham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1986No. 8512SC806PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Defendant first assigns error to the court’s sentencing him for assault on a female, on the grounds that assault on a female is not a lesser included offense of attempted rape. We note that defendant did not object to the submission of the offense to the jury. Failure to object at trial ordinarily waives the right to assert error on appeal. App. R. 10(b)(2). However, the sufficiency of a criminal charge may be challenged without any exceptions or assignment of error having been made. App. R. 10(a). It is well established that an indictment for a greater offense is a sufficient…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. United States v. Glennon E. Engleman, United States of America v. Robert Handy, United States of America v. Glennon E. EnglemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Robert Jackson, William Scott and Martin AllenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Long v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. City of Greenville v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. State v. LinerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API