Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1966No. 90PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

Defendant makes two assignments of error: (1) the refusal of the court to dismiss the charges against him upon his motions for nonsuit, and (2) the failure of the court to instruct the jury that they might acquit him of the crime of armed robbery charged in the indictment and convict him of an assault with a deadly weapon upon Adams. G.S. 15-169. The first assignment requires no discussion. The factual statement reveals evidence plenary to convict defendant of the charges contained in both bills of indictment. The gist of defendant’s appeal is his second assignment of error.

The question…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. People v. WakefordMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. KemmerlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API