Legal Opinion

State v. Rogers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1968No. 247PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Deféndant in apt time made motion to quash the bill of indictment. He- contends that this motion should have been allowed since the bill of indictment did not apprise defendant of the place where the crime was alleged to have occurred, so as to enable defendant to prepare his defense and protect him from a second prosecution for the same offense.

The only description in the indictment as to the place where the •crime was committed is that it occurred in Mecklenburg County.

Every defendant has the constitutional right to be informed of the accusation against him and the warrant or indictment…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. State v. . QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. State v. . WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. SpillarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. SwaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API