Legal Opinion
Slavin v. City of Glendale
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 9, 1950No. Civ. 17314PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.
The appeal herein is from a judgment entered after the sustaining, without leave to amend, of a demurrer to the third amended complaint. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges damages resulting from an assault and battery committed by certain police officers of the city of Glendale. To the original complaint, defendants demurred on the ground that the city was not liable for the type of tort alleged, and that plaintiff had not filed a verified claim for the damages, as required by the city charter and ordinance. This demurrer was sustained.
Likewise a demurrer was sustained to an amended complaint, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Huffaker v. DeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lee v. HensleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Rand v. AndreattaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Hills Transportation Co. v. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Fredrichsen v. City of LakewoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Tostevin v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.