Legal Opinion
Huffaker v. Decker
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 1946No. Civ. 7260PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEMMON, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff instituted an action against the defendant, Decker, to recover damages for injuries claimed to have been proximately sustained through the negligence of Decker. It was alleged in the complaint that such negligence occurred while Decker was driving a Ford truck, owned by the city of Bedding, and that he was then the employee of the city and acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident. A demurrer was interposed upon the ground that the complaint did not allege compliance with sections 1980, 1981 and 1982 of the Government Code. The demurrer…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Winslow v. Harold G. Ferguson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Artukovich v. AstendorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hall v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Group v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Veriddo v. RenaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Slavin v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Jeffers v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- State v. Zia, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.