Legal Opinion

State v. Ault

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1991No. CX-91-1202PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

This pretrial appeal is from an order suppressing a blood test. We reverse.

FACTS

Respondent Corrine Ault was stopped on March 24, 1991, when officers observed her traveling in the wrong lane of traffic. The arresting officer observed indicia of intoxication, and, when asked, Ault admitted she had been drinking. Ault was arrested and taken to the Law Enforcement Center, where she was given the implied consent advisory and agreed to take a blood test. As part of the advisory, Ault was told she had a right to consult an attorney after submitting to testing. She stated she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. State v. RonnebaumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. State v. WickernCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ShrinerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. State v. DresselCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. State v. HeaneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API