Legal Opinion

State v. Ronnebaum

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1990No. CX-89-1068PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

This is a pretrial state’s appeal of the trial court’s order suppressing evidence in the criminal prosecution of defendant for child sex abuse. The court of appeals, in a 2-1 decision, did not reach the merits of the suppression issue. It ruled that the state did not meet its burden under State v. Webber, 262 N.W.2d 157 (Minn.1977), of showing that the suppression of the evidence, if sustained, will have a “critical impact” on the outcome of the prosecution. State v. Ronnebaum, 446 N.W.2d 699, 701-02 (Minn.App.1989). The dissent argued that under our decision in State v. Joon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State v. EverettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. HinceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API