Legal Opinion

State v. Dressel

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 19, 2009No. A08-2130PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSON, Judge.

Robert Paul Dressel, Jr., is charged with several offenses arising from an incident involving his three-year-old daughter. The district court granted Dressel’s motion to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officers after taking a polygraph examination, and the state has challenged the district court’s ruling in this pre-trial appeal. We conclude that the district court erred by suppressing Dres-sel’s post-polygraph statements on the ground that the statements were made in connection with a polygraph examination. Therefore, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

On May 1,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. State v. KolanderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of West Virginia v. Tyler G.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael NowackiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  3. State of Tennessee v. Quintis McCalebTennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State of West Virginia v. Tyler G.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API