Legal Opinion

State v. Atwood

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 2018No. A17-1463PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Travis J. Smith, Murray County Attorney, Slayton, Minnesota (for appellant)

William J. Wetering, Worthington, Minnesota (for respondent)

Considered and decided by Connolly, Presiding Judge; Reilly, Judge; and Reyes, Judge.

CONNOLLY, Judge *424The district court granted respondent's motion to suppress a blood sample that had been taken from respondent by a medical professional because the blood sample was protected by Minnesota's physician-patient privilege pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 595.02, subd. 1(d). Because a blood sample does not fall…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. State v. StaatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. State v. ObetaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. State v. HeaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API