State v. Atwood
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Travis J. Smith, Murray County Attorney, Slayton, Minnesota (for appellant)
William J. Wetering, Worthington, Minnesota (for respondent)
Considered and decided by Connolly, Presiding Judge; Reilly, Judge; and Reyes, Judge.
CONNOLLY, Judge *424The district court granted respondent's motion to suppress a blood sample that had been taken from respondent by a medical professional because the blood sample was protected by Minnesota's physician-patient privilege pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 595.02, subd. 1(d). Because a blood sample does not fall…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. StaatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State v. ObetaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. HeaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019