Legal Opinion
State v. Heaney
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 30, 2004No. A03-1401PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
Respondent Joseph Steven Heaney is charged with four counts of criminal vehicular operation resulting in death, and four counts of criminal vehicular operation resulting in substantial bodily harm, as a result of a one-car accident that occurred in Houston County. One passenger died at the scene of the accident and another passenger was seriously injured. The state appeals a district court order suppressing Heaney’s blood plasma sample and test results on the sample subpoenaed from a Wisconsin hospital where Heaney was treated following the accident. We conclude that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HeaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. PoetschkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019