Legal Opinion
State v. Wickern
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 8, 1987No. C6-87-625PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
The State of Minnesota appeals from a pre-trial order suppressing the results of an Intoxilyzer 5000 breath test in a prosecution for violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subds. 1(a), (d), and (e) (Supp.1985). We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
Respondent Michael William Wickern was arrested at approximately 2:00 a.m. on June 28, 1986, and charged with violating Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (Supp.1985), the DWI statute. About 15 to 25 minutes were spent at the scene, and then 10 to 15 minutes were spent transporting respondent to the jail. Respondent was then placed in a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Tate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State, City of St. Louis Park v. QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Hager v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. DedmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. AultCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Derek Alexander Knapp v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
- State v. AultCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991