Legal Opinion

State v. Humphrey

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1991No. 900434PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Petitioners Vaughn Humphrey, Harry Jamar Gordan, and Bruce Mathews are criminal defendants in unrelated felony cases pending in the district courts of this state. A circuit court judge acting as a magistrate bound each defendant over for trial in district court. Each defendant then moved the district court to quash the bind-over order. In each case, the district court denied the motion, holding that it lacked jurisdiction to quash bindover orders. Each defendant filed an interlocutory appeal with the Utah Court of Appeals. That court affirmed the district court rulings. State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SchreuderUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Monticello v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. FreemanUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Van Dam v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. WhittleUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Pledger v. GillespieUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. BlubaughCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  5. State v. HolmUtah Supreme Court · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API