State v. Whittle
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Associate Chief Justice:
¶ 1 Defendant Forrest Whittle appeals from a jury conviction for murder, a first degree felony in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-203. Whittle asserts that because of flagrant prosecutorial misconduct during the grand jury proceedings leading to his indictment, the indictment and subsequent conviction should be set aside. In addition, he argues that because there is a reasonable likelihood that, absent a combination of evi-dentiary errors at trial, he would not have been convicted, his conviction should be set aside. We affirm.
¶2 According to the testimony…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- State v. VargasUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2005
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.