Legal Opinion

Pledger v. Gillespie

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1999No. 980133PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Justice:

¶ 1 On writ of certiorari, Cigna Health-plan seeks review of the Utah Court of Appeals’ decision that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Cigna’s appeal. Cigna had appealed from the district court’s denial of its motions to compel arbitration and set aside a summary judgment.

FACTS

¶ 2 This case involves a payment dispute for medical services that Dr. Charles Pledger rendered to his patient, Ople Gillespie. At the time the services were provided, Gillespie was insured by Cigna Healthplan and Dr. Pledger was a participating physician of that insurance plan. Dr. Pledger and Cigna…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Docutel Olivetti Corp. v. Dick Brady Systems Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. HumphreyUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Chandler v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. LHIW, INC. v. DeLoreanUtah Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Powell v. CannonUtah Supreme Court · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API