City of Monticello v. Christensen
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
Defendant Lee Christensen, convicted in circuit court of operating a motor vehicle in Utah while his privilege to drive was suspended, claims error in the dismissal of his appeal to the Utah Court of Appeals. He argues, inter alia, that the court violated his constitutional right to an appeal, as guaranteed by article I, section 12 of the Utah Constitution, when it dismissed his appeal and that even if the court did not violate his constitutional rights, it nonetheless erred in dismissing his appeal because he properly preserved a constitutional issue, as required by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- In re Criminal Investigation, 7th District Court No. CS-1Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Wilson v. Eureka CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. Rio Vista Oil, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Society of Separationists, Inc. v. WhiteheadUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Salt Lake City v. OhmsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. VirginUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Bernat v. AllphinUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- JH BY DH v. West Valley CityUtah Supreme Court · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.