Legal Opinion

State v. Holm

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2006No. 20030847PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

{ 1 In this case, we are asked to determine whether Rodney Hans Holm was appropriately convicted for bigamy and unlawful sexual conduct with a minor. Specifically, we are asked to determine whether Holm's be-bavior violated Utah's bigamy statute and whether that statute is constitutional. We are also asked to decide whether the trial court adequately established its criminal jurisdiction over the unlawful sexual conduct charges and whether the unlawful sexual conduct statute is unconstitutional on equal protection grounds. We conclude that Holm's behavior falls squarely…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SwensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Brown v. BuhmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In Re Adoption of T.H.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  5. State v. BriggsUtah Supreme Court · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API