Legal Opinion
E.R. Mitchell Construction Co. v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary of the Navy
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 10, 1999No. 98-1483PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
This is a government contracts case. The facts are not in dispute, and the only-issue for decision is one of law: whether the government is liable for unabsorbed home office overhead costs of a subcontractor, whose work is delayed by the government, when the prime contractor is not delayed in the completion of its contract with the government. The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held that the government is only liable for a subcontractor’s unabsorbed home office overhead costs when the prime contractor is delayed by the government in performance of its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Severin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
- Blount Brothers Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Wickham Contracting Co., Inc. v. Dennis J. Fischer, Acting Administrator, General Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- First Hartford Corp. Pension Plan & Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Interstate Contracting Corp. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- P.J. Dick Inc. v. PrincipiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Nicon, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- ACE Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.