Legal Opinion

ACE Constructors, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 31, 2006No. 04-299CPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

In this contract ease, the court conducted a 5-day trial on October 17 through 21, 2005, in El Paso, Texas. Plaintiff ACE Constructors, Inc. (“ACE”) contracted with the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“the Corps”) to construct the Ammo Ho1>-Load Facility at Biggs Army Airfield, Fort Bliss, El Paso, TX. That facility consists primarily of a roadway, a storage pad, a loading apron, and a taxiway that is connected with the main runway at Biggs Army Airfield, and it enables munitions to be transferred onto cargo aircraft for transport. ACE claims that it was…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Graves v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Nvt Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Ace Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  3. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  4. Eastern Electric Corp. v. Shoemaker Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API