Legal Opinion
In re Tobacco Cases I
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 2011No. D056589PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCONNELL, P. J.
In In re Tobacco Cases I (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 42 [111 Cal.Rptr.3d 313], this court affirmed an order in which the trial court granted the People of the State of California relief on their action against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (Reynolds) to enforce a consent decree and final judgment (Consent Decree) entered on a master settlement agreement (MSA). We agreed that certain images Reynolds used in an advertising campaign for Camel cigarettes violated the cartoon ban in the MSA, which was incorporated into the Consent Decree.
*1596In this companion appeal, Reynolds…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Plotnik v. MeihausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Marlene Penrod v. Americredit Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Schoshinksi v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Taburaza v. Zarate (In re Zarate)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.