Legal Opinion

Plotnik v. Meihaus

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 2012No. G045885; No. G046260PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs David and Joyce Plotnik sued their neighbor, defendant John Meihaus, Jr. (Meihaus), and two of his sons, defendants Greg Meihaus and John Meihaus III, alleging both contract and tort claims. In part, plaintiffs sought recovery for the emotional distress they suffered when Meihaus injured their dog. The superior court entered a judgment on jury verdicts that awarded David Plotnik over $175,000 against all defendants and Joyce Plotnik over $255,000 against Meihaus. The awards included emotional distress damages resulting from the dog’s injury. In…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Yun Hee So v. Sook Ja ShinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Carla Strickland v. Kathryn and Jeremy MedlenTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
  4. Andrade v. Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  5. Scripsamerica, Inc. v. Ironridge Global LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API