Legal Opinion
Taburaza v. Zarate (In re Zarate)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
Decided February 2, 2017No. Case No. 14-42250 RLE; Adversary Proceeding No. 14-4119PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs and Order Thereon
Roger L. Efremsky, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
I. Introduction
On September 15, 2016, the court entered a stipulated judgment in favor of plaintiffs Joseph and Juliana Taburaza. The judgment states that defendants owe a non-dischargeable debt of $831,018.31 to plaintiffs. October 13, 2016, plaintiffs filed this motion for an award of attorney’s fees and costs as the prevailing party in the adversary proceeding. Defendants opposed this motion. The matter has been fully briefed and argued. This is the court’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Asphalt Prof'ls Inc. v. Davis (In re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Peterson v. Lusk (In re Lusk)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Hunter v. Martin DBA Veronica Rose Productions, IncUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2019
- In re: Darin DavisUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- In re: Paul William MartinUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.