Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Jan

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1957No. Civ. 22430PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal by defendant Bobert Wanamaker from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in a condemnation action.

The plaintiff brought an action in eminent domain to take a number of parcels of real property for the construction, operation and maintenance thereon of a permanent channel and appurtenant works to carry, control and confine the flood, storm and waste waters of the Bio Hondo Channel. Among the parcels to be taken was one known as parcel 70, which consisted of a strip about 250 feet wide, from property owned by appellant and on which he operated an airport.

The complaint set forth,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. City of Oakland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  3. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Vallejo & Northern Railroad v. Home Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. County of San Luis Obispo v. SimasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. DaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LagissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Lux Land & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ParachiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API