San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Lux Land & Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
This is an action in eminent domain by which the plaintiff, the respondent herein, seeks to acquire an easement over the property of the defendants Engel, the appellants herein, for an electrical transmission line, a gas line, and a telephone line. The issues of public use and necessity were tried before a judge without a jury, who found in favor of the plaintiff. The compensation issue was tried before a different judge by a jury which fixed the defendants’ damages in the sum of $7,201. Judgment of condemnation was entered accordingly, and the defendants have appealed therefrom. On appeal,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Metropolitan Water District v. Campus Crusade for Christ, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Bangor Hydro-Electric CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- City of Livermore v. BacaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ParachiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.