People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Lagiss
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment in a condemnation action awarding him $10,000 for property condemned for highway purposes.
Questions Presented
1. Did defendant stipulate that the taking of the entire ' parcel was necessary?
2. Did defendant’s answer plead a cause of defense ?
3. Did the court err in denying defendant’s offer of proof that the Highway Commission was acting in bad faith ?
4. Did the filing of the third amended answer in effect waive error in sustaining of demurrer to prior answers ?
Record
After adoption by the California Highway Commission of the resolution of public interest and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Hoel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Schultz Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Redington v. CornwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. NahabedianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Moving Picture MacHine Operators Union Local No. 162 v. Glasgow Theaters, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LagissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.