Legal Opinion

County of San Luis Obispo v. Simas

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1905No. Nos. 3 and 9PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from a final order of condemnation, and from an order staying proceedings and letting plaintiff into possession, and separate appeal from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Plaintiff and respondent had judgment, final order of condemnation, and order letting into possession in this proceeding, brought by the district attorney of San Luis Obispo County, under direction of the board of supervisors, as provided by section 2690 of the Political Code, to condemn a right of way for a public road which such board had theretofore determined should be laid out and opened over the lands of defendants and other persons not parties to this action. Defendants appeal from the judgment upon the judgment-roll, from the final order of condemnation upon a bill of exceptions, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Judson v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Steinhart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Sherer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Ex parte BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Sutton v. Otis Elevator Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Switzler v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API