Legal Opinion

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Parachini

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1972No. Civ. 38449PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FILES, P. J.

This eminent domain proceeding was brought to acquire an easement 350 feet in width across defendants’ cattle ranch for two 500 kilovolt transmission lines, on a route between the Diablo Canyon generating site in San Luis Obispo County and the Gates substation near Coalinga. After a jury trial, a judgment was entered on August 7, 1970 that plaintiff was entitled to take the easement upon payment of $30,800 to defendants. A final order of condemnation was entered the same day. Defendants are appealing from both the judgment and the order.

*162Defendants’ first two contentions are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. People v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Central Pacific Ry. Co. v. FeldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. WassermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cantu v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Water Resources v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. HayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Foley Investments v. Alisal Water Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ParachiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API