Legal Opinion
People v. Thomas
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1952No. Civ. 4408PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
Two eminent domain proceedings were filed in Riverside County for the purpose of acquiring real property and abutter’s rights of access owned by appellants and others. People v. Charles A. Thomas et al., No. 47581, was instituted for the purpose of constructing a new limited access freeway, Road VIII-Riv-77-E, where no highway existed before, and People v. Fred F. Botiller et al., No. 49411, for the purpose of converting the existing Santa Ana Canyon Highway, Road VIII-Riv-43-A, into a limited access freeway. The two proceedings were consolidated for the purpose of a jury trial.
As both…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Holloway v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Monterey County v. CushingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- City of Los Angeles v. GeigerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. OlsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ClevengerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.