Legal Opinion

Palmer v. First Minneapolis Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1930No. 27,646PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 230 N.W. 257, 258. Action to cancel upon the ground of usury certain notes and the deed of trust securing them. The trial without a jury resulted in a decision for defendant, judgment being ordered in its favor.

1. There was no motion for a new trial, and the attempted appeal is from the order for judgment, a nonappealable order. Hence the appeal must be and is dismissed. Orth v. Walters,155 Minn. 131, 192 N.W. 936; Wm. Weisman Realty Co. v. Cohen,160 Minn. 440, 200 N.W. 636; Brochin v. Lifson, 172 Minn. 51,215 N.W. 180; 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. (2 ed.) § 295, and cases cited under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Pioneer Land & Loan Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Goodhue County National Bank v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Morrissey v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Hawkins v. FoasbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  2. Shema v. Thorpe Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Mienes v. Lucker Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Fred G. Clark Co. v. E. C. Warner Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Dege v. Produce Exchange BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API