Palmer v. First Minneapolis Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 230 N.W. 257, 258. Action to cancel upon the ground of usury certain notes and the deed of trust securing them. The trial without a jury resulted in a decision for defendant, judgment being ordered in its favor.
1. There was no motion for a new trial, and the attempted appeal is from the order for judgment, a nonappealable order. Hence the appeal must be and is dismissed. Orth v. Walters,155 Minn. 131, 192 N.W. 936; Wm. Weisman Realty Co. v. Cohen,160 Minn. 440, 200 N.W. 636; Brochin v. Lifson, 172 Minn. 51,215 N.W. 180; 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. (2 ed.) § 295, and cases cited under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Pioneer Land & Loan Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Goodhue County National Bank v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Morrissey v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Hawkins v. FoasbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
- Shema v. Thorpe Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Mienes v. Lucker Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Fred G. Clark Co. v. E. C. Warner Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Dege v. Produce Exchange BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.