Legal Opinion
Goodhue County National Bank v. Fleming
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 25, 1926No. 25,280PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying its motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial, the court having directed a verdict for defendant.
The action is upon a written guaranty, dated January 28, 1916, and executed by 30 persons, one of whom was defendant. So far as material it reads:
“Whereas in the course of the conducting of the business which the said company is carrying on at said City and elsewhere, it is now, and hereafter will often be necessary for the said company to borrow money in addition to its line of credit, and it being understood and agreed by and among all the parties…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Utica City National Bank v. GunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Merchants' National Bank of Whitehall v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Pioneer Land & Loan Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Midland National Bank v. Security Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Naffke v. NaffkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Palmer v. First Minneapolis Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Morrissey v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Amidon v. Traverse Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Donlin v. WamsleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.