Legal Opinion

Mienes v. Lucker Sales Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 1933No. 29,222PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Justice.

Tried without a jury, this case resulted in a decision for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for amended findings or a new trial.

From September 12, 1928, to April 5, 1930, plaintiff was in the employ of defendant as a salesman of radio receiving sets under a written contract, which, on the latter date, was lawfully terminated by defendant. The decision below awarded plaintiff a recovery of $1,384.76. It was based upon application of the following determinative provisions of the contract.

“Merchandise must be sold at our regular dealer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilmot v. Minneapolis Automobile Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Pioneer Land & Loan Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Palmer v. First Minneapolis Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. National Surety Co. v. WittichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. McCormick v. HoffertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Martens v. MartensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Alsdorf v. SvobodaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Wallace v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API