Legal Opinion

Fred G. Clark Co. v. E. C. Warner Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 24, 1933No. Nos. 29,097, 29,098PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Chief Justice.

The Fred G-. Clark Company, a Minnesota corporation, sued E. C. Warner Company, a corporation, E. C. Warner, and Harold L. Warner to cancel, on the ground of usury, six promissory notes given by plaintiff to the E. C. Warner Company, dated and in the amounts as follows:

March 19, 1928 $ 5,000

March 28, 1928 10,000

April 20, 1928 10,000

April 24, 1928 - 4,000

April 25, 1928 12,000

March 14, 1929 22,000

Total $63,000

Upon this indebtedness $1,000 had been paid. The action also sought to cancel certificate No. 9 for 37 shares of the capital common stock of plaintiff corporation…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Carozza v. Federal Finance & Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Hawkins v. Kronick Cleaning & Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Lukens v. HazlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Clarke v. . SheehanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Douglass v. Boulevard Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fogie v. Thorn Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. Needles v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Farmers State Bank v. Sig Ellingson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Holcombe v. O'SULLIVANDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API