Legal Opinion

Kwan-Sa You v. Roe

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 16, 1990No. 8914SC316PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Where a motion for summary judgment is granted, the critical questions for determination on appeal are whether, on the basis of materials presented to the trial court, there is a genuine issue of material fact and whether the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Oliver v. Roberts, 49 N.C. App. 311, 271 S.E.2d 399 (1980), cert. denied, 276 S.E.2d 283 (1981). Here the trial court entered summary judgment on all of plaintiffs claims against all defendants except medical malpractice, false imprisonment and violation of Art. 5A, Ch. 122 (recodified as Ch. 122C, part 7)…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Henry v. DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dobson v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Ed Peters Jewelry Co. v. C & J Jewelry Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. Clark v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Varner v. BryanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Dobson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API