Legal Opinion
Varner v. Bryan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided March 1, 1994No. 9210SC1199PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
The record on appeal contains six assignments of error, all of which are related to the entry of summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs claims. Initially, we note that plaintiff has not brought forward in his brief any reason or argument in support of his assignment of error relating to the dismissal of his claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress and has, therefore, abandoned the assignment of error. N.C. R. App. P., Rule 28(b)(5). Therefore, we will consider only those assignments of error relating to the entry of summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claims…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Alexander v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Griffin v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Benjamin v. SparksDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
- MLC Automotive, LLC v. Town of Southern PinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.