Legal Opinion

Maellaro v. Madison Finance Co. of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 22, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The determinative question is whether respondent, a small loan company licensed under R. S. 17:10-1, et seq., was guilty of a violation of section 17:10-14 of the statute in these circumstances:

Appellant desired to purchase an automobile upon which there was a lien in the sum of $238. He applied to respondent for a loan in this sum to satisfy the lien. The application was granted with the understanding that appellant would give a mortgage upon the vehicle as security for the loan. The chattel was appraised at $255. Respondent also asked for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Niles v. KavanaghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Friedman v. Wisconsin Acceptance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Martorano v. Capital Finance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Platz v. LapinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Auto Owners' Finance Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Family Finance Corp. v. GoughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. State v. FleischmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  3. In Re RichardsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1967
  4. Sunderland v. DayIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Sunderland v. DayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API