Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Wisconsin Acceptance Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1927PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 9, 1926:

Doerfler, J.

The action is based upon the theory that the contract entered into is in violation of the usury statutes of the state; that having received only the sum of $300 in cash, a tender for that amount was sufficient; that in exacting the sum of $51 for insurance, investigation, and interest, the loan became usurious. A number of interesting questions were presented by counsel, both in their brief and argument, but in deciding this'case we will dwell only upon such as may be necessary to the proper determination of the issue.

The charge for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Niles v. KavanaghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Cornell v. BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. First Nat. Bank of Ada v. PharesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Central Bank of Wisconsin v. St. JohnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Towslee v. DurkeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Mid-West Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. Baker v. ButcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API