Legal Opinion

Auto Owners' Finance Co. v. Coleman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 3, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

The case involves a Massachusetts transaction the validity of which depends upon the construction of certain legislation in that state and of a mortgage included in the transaction. The transaction was between the plaintiff and one Rozman. He applied to the plaintiff for a loan of 1300 to be secured by a mortgage of the replevied automobile which he then owned. The loan was made, the plaintiff taking six dollars of its amount to pay for fire and theft insurance on the automobile. The mortgage was duly recorded. Thereafter Rozman sold the automobile without actual notice to the purchaser of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cuneo v. BornsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Ternan v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Glidden v. NasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re RichardsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1967
  2. Maellaro v. Madison Finance Co. of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  3. Sunderland v. DayIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Martorano v. Capital Finance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API