Legal Opinion

Niles v. Kavanagh

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1918No. S. F. No. 8669PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a chattel mortgage executed by the defendants to secure the payment of their promissory note for six hundred dollars, with interest at two per cent per month. From the judgment, which was in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

The execution of the note and mortgage, and the nonpayment of the amount for which judgment was given, are not questioned, the sole claim of the defendants being that the loan evidenced by the note and mortgage was void under the terms of “an act to define personal property brokers and regulate their charge and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New England Mortgage Security Co. v. GayU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1888

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Friedman v. Wisconsin Acceptance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Clarke v. HoranyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API