Legal Opinion
Platz v. Lapinski
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1933No. Docket No. 83, Calendar No. 37,066PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
The facts ixi this case are stipulated. The Auto Loan & Discount Company was duly licensed to operate under what is known as the ‘ ‘ small loan act” (3 Comp. Laws 1929, §12198 et seq.). Under section 12210 interest may be charged at a rate not exceeding 3% per cent, per month on loans not exceeding $300. It further provides:
“In addition to the interest herein provided for, no further or other charge or amount whatsoever for any examination, service, brokerage, commission, or other thing or otherwise shall be directly or indirectly charged, contracted for, or received, except the lawful fees,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Bankers Finance Corp.New York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1942
- Martorano v. Capital Finance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Smetal Corporation v. Family Loan Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- In Re RichardsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1967
- Maellaro v. Madison Finance Co. of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.