Legal Opinion

Sunderland v. Day

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1957No. 34275PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

As originally filed, the complaint in this case raised numerous constitutional and other questions going to the validity and the construction of the Small Loans Act and one of the regulations of the Department of Insurance under that act. In the progress of the case through the trial and Appellate courts many of the contentions once advanced have been abandoned. As the case now stands in this court, the single question is whether or not a licensee under the Small Loans Act can require a borrower to purchase credit life insurance as a condition precedent to the making of a loan.

The answer to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The City of Chicago v. BarnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Merchants Exchange National Bank v. Commercial Warehouse Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Commonwealth Life & Accident Insurance v. Board of Review of the Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Braun v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Niles v. KavanaghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garza v. Chicago Health Clubs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  2. James L. Martin v. Commercial Securities Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. In Re Taxes, Aiea Dairy, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Hodgman, Inc. v. FeldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Kessler v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Hawaii, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API