Hamilton v. Dwelling House Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Genesee. (Newton, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
Plaintiff, being the owner in fee-simple of lot 10, block B, a parcel of land in the city of Flint, contracted to sell the same to John W. Shearer by an instrument in writing dated June 16, 1888, for the sum of $400. Shearer took possession and made improvements, paid $75 of the contract price, besides interest, and occupied the premises at the time of a fire, which consumed the dwelling thereon. The plaintiff had previously contracted the premises to one Giles, who had procured insurance upon the building from defendant’s agent, though in another company, which insurance was payable to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hough v. City Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
- Clay Fire & Marine Insurance v. Huron Salt & Lumber Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Hoose v. Prescott InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Hall v. Niagara Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Dupreau v. Hibernia InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Rosenstock v. Mississippi Home InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1903
- McCoy v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Phoenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn, N.Y. v. QuinetteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Quackenbush v. Citizens' Insurance Co. of MissouriMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.