Dupreau v. Hibernia Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit on an insurance policy. Defendant brings error. The facts, and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Defendant issued its policy of insurance to plaintiff on May 15, 1888, for the sum of $500, — $400 upon his dwelling-house, and $100 on his barn.
The application was verbal, and was made to Schceneberg; & Knight, at East Saginaw, this State, who were the local agents of the defendant company there. They were required to make their reports and remittances to John Naghten & *616Uo., general agents of the western department at Chicago, Illinois.
The policy was issued and delivered to the plaintiff on the above date, and a premium of $7.50 duly paid, the policy to continue in force for three years from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Imperial F. Ins. v. DunhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. FogelmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Colorado Leasing, Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Insurance Co. of North America v. EricksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- Matthews v. Capital Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.